top of page
Featured Posts

Back to: Blog

               Homepage

C'mon Suckers! - David Wardell

In the UK it’s been an interesting week for that good-old inventors’ favourite - vacuum cleaners. First we had some Eurosceptic jingoistic furore over the European Commission limiting the size of vacuum cleaner motors and then James Dyson announced the launch of his new (or is it?) robot cleaner…

Dyson with his 360 Eye.png

Certain sections of the press have been rattling their collective sabres, with one tabloid thundering “Banning vacuum cleaners isn’t about saving the planet – it’s about Brussels grabbing even more power!” The fires of the controversy were stoked by Which? Magazine by advising: “If you’re in the market for a powerful vacuum, you should act quickly, before all of the models currently available sell out.” Seven of their ‘best buys’ will be outlawed by the new 1600 watt limit.

Now that the dust has settled, it would appear that the EU directive makes perfect sense. According to their data the ban will save, annually, the equivalent of the domestic power consumption of Belgium (akin to throwing away 105 million large screen televisions). The new directive forces vacuum cleaners to be 63 per cent more efficient and will cut European energy bills by £2.4 billion (a whopping £11 per household per year).

If you read the complete Which? release, after the warning it goes on to say: “Despite what is being widely reported by some other media outlets, a large motor size does not guarantee impressive action. Our independent testing has found many Best Buy vacuums under 1,600 watts, proving that clever engineering and a well-designed floorhead are equally, if not more important, than a powerful motor.”

The new rules are set to become stricter in September 2017 when the maximum wattage will be reduced to 900 watts. Experts say this is perfectly reasonable – Dyson have never had a motor that exceeds 1600 watts (indeed, they have been using some motors as small as 700 watts since 2008). To me, this sounds like the perfect opportunity for inventors and designers to get their thinking caps on.

Dyson #3.png

And Dyson has been busy too. This week, with a fanfare, he launched his new Dyson 360 Eye™ robot cleaner. Hang on a minute, thinks I, we’ve been here before! I first wrote about the DC06 robotic cleaner in the year 2000 (see Cleaning Up!).

To be fair, Dyson admits that his new cleaner has been 16 years in the making and I think that the DC06 was a bit ambitious. Looking back, it’s astonishing just how far the technology has moved-on in the last 14 years.

‘Most robotic vacuum cleaners don’t see their environment, have little suction, and don’t clean properly. They are gimmicks’ he says, and goes on to claim the new Dyson has ‘more suction power than any other robot vacuum cleaner on the market.’

It certainly boasts impressive specifications but don’t rush out just yet to buy one – It will go on sale, in Japan next year, with the rest of the world to follow.

Dyson #1.png

Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
Archive
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
  • facebook
  • Twitter Clean
  • w-googleplus
IW 0101.png
IW 0201.png
IW 0301.png
IW 0401.png
IW 0501.png
IW 0601.png
IW 0701.png
IW 0801.png
IW 0901.png
IW 1001.png
IW 1101.png
IW 1201.png
IW 1301.png
IW 1401.png

© inventricity.com 2014,2015 - 2016

Warning - We are always delighted to receive information from inventors and companies regarding their wonderful inventions.  However, please do not send us confidential information.  You should not disclose your ideas or inventions before either taking professional advice, or stipulating a binding and specific confidentiality agreement, or filing a patent application at the Intellectual Property Office.  Inventors who disclose the details of their invention before filing will not be able to obtain a valid patent.  This advice applies to any disclosure, no matter how select or reputable the agency.  You should not talk to the press, radio, television or any other media, nor should you enter into competitions/exhibitions, or give lectures/presentations without adequate Intellectual Property Protection.

 

Articles and information produced on this site are concerned with general principles only and should not be construed as specific advice.  Intellectual Property Rights and their commercial development are complex subjects and professional advice should always be sought at the appropriate stage.  Procedures and regulations vary from country to country.  Opinions expressed are those of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of Inventricity.com                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Disclaimer

bottom of page